Western hypocrisy

Abdussamad.com

Western hypocrisy

Comments

DIPESH
1
*If westerners were really intolerant London, and in fact the whole UK wouldn't be so overcrowded with Muslims and you wouldn't have any Muslim MPs. Which muslim nation has got so many westeners living in it and are holding a government post such as a MP or minister?
Abdussamad Abdurrazzaq
1.1
*Western nations accept migration from Muslim countries because it serves their own interests. They have a dearth of skilled labour and so they allow skilled workers and investors to migrate to their countries. This sort of migration leads to economic growth that benefits all citizens.

Also they have to provide a legal migration path to dissuade people from going their illegally.

Now as far as MPs are concerned, why is it such a magnificent gesture of tolerance if Muslim MPs have to swear an oath to their queen and their christian flag and their English laws? It really isn't now, is it?

The british have a long history of recruiting natives in their colonies to do their bidding. That is how a few thousand whites managed to rule over millions of Indians. This is just another phase of that.

Look at the recent spate of intolerance. Muslims aren't allowed to build mosques. Mosques can't have minarets or sound the call to prayer. Intolerance is rampant.

Almost all Muslim countries have westerners living in them. Just like westerners need skilled labourers from poor countries, so poor countries recruit skilled workers from the west. Lots of top management of companies and NGO workers in Pakistan are white. In Saudi Arabia Aramco recruits many American workers.

Non of them have govt. positions because they are not citizens of Muslim countries. That is because, unlike western countries, it does not serve our interests to allow them to become citizens.
tasaduq
1.2
*may be not minister or mp are in the muslim countries but if you see all business booses are western people
either it is indonesia or malaysia or arab nations
and almost all muslim leaders are puppet of western nations either king of suadi arabia or afghans krazi
if some one oppose west than he is no more in the power.
example sadam a bad dictator but secular he was thrown out becoz us dont like him
saudi arab kings are bad dictators and hard core but friends of us so they are ruling
this is called hyprocrisy
Daedalus
2
*Respecting a nation and the rights it offers you is not too hypocritical. The real hypocrisy demonstrated from the west, and I can testify about it because I have lived in it, is the ignorant assumptions they make about numerous minority cultural groups as being oppressive or out of date. They try to demonize polygamy when it is permissible for a man to live "polygamously", yet have no legal responsibility for his relationships. It is argued that nations outside are oppressive to gender rights, when there's plenty of conditions, such as poverty, a poorly educated populace, lack of effective commerce, that make most of the population live in shambles, and almost all too easily compel plenty of people to live in seemingly backward ways. I am not Muslim, but I do respect some of the principles that you stand for. And wish you the best.

-Daedalus

Add Comment


Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated bots from comment spamming, please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image below in the appropriate input box.
CAPTCHA




Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

RSS feed
animated rss feed icon
Quicksearch
Links
My other blogs

Website Themes